The following
information is articles, questions, and answers that have been submitted by
ForeverWed readers. Should these not answer your questions. Feel free to
ask an expert.

Lobola
I’m sure you’ve heard of it. When
folks talk about African cultures, they often mention the concept,
especially when they talk about weddings. Even if you haven’t listened
hard, you might also know that the talk is usually derogatory. What’s
all the talk about? "Bride price." "Lobola." Yes, the practice has
many names. It also has a basic premise: The notion of a male suitor
having the responsibility of offering a payment of some significant
measure in exchange for the opportunity to marry a woman. It’s an
ancient practice in many African communities, and, contrary to what
many have to say about it, this practice of offering bears some
serious consideration.
Think about it. In ancient times,
and today in most households worldwide, women provide the backbone of
support for the family—spiritual fortification, childrearing and often
significant financial contributions. From the time that they’ve grown
tall enough to reach their little hands over the sink, they’ve been
washing dishes and helping Mama to manage the household duties. That’s
not to say that the males in the family haven’t done their fair share.
They do and have been so doing for generations. But no one can
honestly deny the pivotal role that females have in the home—even when
the home is a contemporary one. Which brings us back to the genesis of
the "bride price."
Back in the day, our ancestors’
families understood the tremendous value that young women had in their
own family homes. Depending upon a female’s birth order, she had
varying degrees of responsibility; but in all cases she had to work,
which meant cleaning, mending, cooking, taking care of younger
siblings and otherwise helping to keep the house in order. Now, enter
a potential husband. Here comes a young man with the intentions of
marrying this significant participant in a family unit, which, in
turn, would remove her from the family homestead. From a bottom line
point of view, the loss of the female to the home means a tremendous
value loss in terms of resources, work and potential money for the
family. In other words, losing the young woman to her new husband also
means losing what amounts to dollars and cents for the family. And
that‘s real.
Now many Sisters may acknowledge
that this may be true: her loss means value lost by the family. But
come on! Since when are we looking at ourselves as a piece of property
to be essentially bought and sold? We aren’t. And, although it can be
reasonably argued that some parents from the "old school" were looking
at their daughters as property, there is another variable to keep in
mind: the Brother’s intentions. Parents the world over really have a
bottom-line concern when it comes to their daughters, in particular.
They want to protect them to the best of their ability as they also
provide for them and their needs. When it comes to protection, that
can sometimes mean being a shield between them and a man who does not
have good intentions, or at least not good enough in their eyes.
I often marvel at how clever our
ancestors were. They built insurance policies into so many aspects of
daily living. The marriage ritual was one of them. In traditional
African cultures, a man had to prove his love and commitment to a
woman by paying respect to her and her family. That meant taking the
time to get to know the entire family of the young woman, as well as
bearing the requisite gifts to demonstrate his degree of sincerity and
commitment to the union. The standards of the community and the
family’s economic status and lifestyle determined the stakes.
Generally, the bride price included a pre-determined number of cattle,
bolts of fabric equal to a year’s worth of clothing for the wife, a
specified amount of money to be given to the parents, and an offering
of clear homemade or imported liquor to be shared by the men to salute
the upcoming union. In order to collect all of the above, a young man
generally had to pool his resources with his family. It took a lot of
work and time, both of which are sobering for someone who believes
he’s in love.
A contemporary Zimbabwean film,
entitled Fit, illustrates just how effective the use of a bride
price can be. In this comedy, a community is depicted in which there
is a young beautiful woman who catches every man’s eye. She is being
"courted" by a slick man with a pocket full of cash. Another man, a
hard-working bike messenger, is bitten by the love bug and wants
nothing other than to marry this woman. The pursuit that ensues is
managed by Dear Old Dad, who creates a hefty lobola that has to be met
using contemporary means of exchange, i.e., a fancy new stereo system
and $500 cash.
For the young suitor, such a price
is steep and requires diligent and creative work on his part to meet
the responsibility. When a $4500 refrigerator is added to the lobola,
the price seems nearly impossible. Love and conviction together push
the young man on, until finally he fulfills his goal. The messenger
works to meet the tough demands, while the other throws cash on the
table. What ultimately happens is that the young woman if able to see
devotion at work. Both she and her father believe in the integrity and
genuine interest of the messenger when the decision has to be made.
Now, you may ask, "What does this
have to do with me?" I like to look at our historical practices to
discover their merit in contemporary times. When it comes to the
traditional use of bride price, I (a moderate feminist) actually do
believe in its value, to a certain degree. I believe that anything
that will slow a couple down so that they think long and hard about
getting married before they pledge their lives to one another can be a
good thing. Everyone who is or who has been married will tell you that
marriage isn’t easy. Building a life with a partner—for life—means
that you must commit to working at your life together.
Getting whisked off your feet isn’t
the best way to walk into a lifetime commitment. Further, being
whisked away from your family without offering respect for what they
have done to guide you isn’t showing respect. In the traditional
sense, reintroducing the practice of offering a "bride price" may be a
reasonable pursuit for a couple who plan to marry, to help them to
look at their commitment and their familial respect. In contemporary
African society, however, I’m told that many families often shy away
from the practice because it has been taken out of context and
exaggerated to ridiculous measure. In other words, some families are
getting downright greedy and breaking a young man’s bank rather than
helping to fortify a budding union.
So, how might this tradition be
incorporated in marriages today? Conceptually, the offering of gifts
of love to one’s family at such a turning point makes sense. Why not
expand upon the tradition and work together as a couple to present
gifts to both of your families? After all, you likely are grateful for
all of the love and support that your fiancé’s parents and family have
showered upon him during his childhood and evolving adulthood.
Likewise, he must also be filled with gratitude for all that your
family has contributed to help you become the person you are today.
As the preparations ensue, do
yourselves and your families a favor and take time out for them. Your
"lobola" offering can be something of great value—although not
necessarily of great expenses—that signifies your love and respect for
your families and that will remind them of your love in the years to
come. Consider an engraved crystal bowl or other vessel that can be
used to pour a libation to the ancestors at your wedding. A handmade
quilt that has love-stitched wording expressing your devotion or a
more traditional variation of the ancient ways, such as a combination
of gifts for each family homestead and cash, may be your choices. Get
creative. You will be surprised at how much fun it can be—and how
gratifying for you to honor your families in this historic way.
Much love.
Editorial Note: Excerpted from
Signature Bride Magazine, Spring 1998 issue. Copyright 1998. Reprinted
with permission from Signature Bride Magazine.
|
|
|
e information contained
here are questions that have been previously answered by our
consultants, our readers have generously allowed us to post
their questions to help future readers. ForeverWed
does not post questions/answers without the permission of
the authors first. All names have been changed to
protect our readers.
|
|
|